Out of Topic Chatforum!

[maykel]

quote author=marvinofthefaintsmile link=topic=42.msg70215#msg70215 date=1290669064]
yeah! So.. what do u think sang category ka? aq?

I fall under Phlegmatic - do not display emotions, can easily adopt to changes..
And Sanguine - Forgetfull, messy, disorganize...

Nakuha ko ung negative attributes ng Sanguine not the positve attributes...

Ikaw, ndi ko lam kasi ndi pa kita lubusang kilala.. [
[/quote]

ang gulong basahin... eto po talaga ung post ko..

yeah! So.. what do u think sang category ka? aq?

I fall under Phlegmatic - do not display emotions, can easily adopt to changes..
And Sanguine - Forgetfull, messy, disorganize...

Nakuha ko ung negative attributes ng Sanguine not the positve attributes...

Ikaw, ndi ko lam kasi ndi pa kita lubusang kilala..

[ctan]

I'm a Sanguine-Choleric

[maykel]

I'm a Sanguine-Choleric

nice!!!! ang magkalaban na personality ay nasau...

[marvinofthefaintsmile]

^^ na nosebleed nmn aq sa mga pinag-uusapan nyo? Anu b best fit sakin?

[maykel]

^^ na nosebleed nmn aq sa mga pinag-uusapan nyo? Anu b best fit sakin?

Dahil Emo ka daw lately(not so sure), eh Melancholic ka.... hahaha.. Peace!!!!

[Mr.Yos0]

good evening, madlang pggsters. 

[ctan]

^^ na nosebleed nmn aq sa mga pinag-uusapan nyo? Anu b best fit sakin?

Dahil Emo ka daw lately(not so sure), eh Melancholic ka.... hahaha.. Peace!!!!

Mukhang more on Melancholic si Vin.

Sa tingin ko, Melancholic-Phlegmatic siya.

[carpediem]

virus na nasa DNA daw ang cause ng schizophrenia, according to some research groups

The Insanity Virus
http://discovermagazine.com/2010/jun/03-the-insanity-virus

[hypebeast]

live voting??

[ctan]

virus na nasa DNA daw ang cause ng schizophrenia, according to some research groups

The Insanity Virus
http://discovermagazine.com/2010/jun/03-the-insanity-virus

This is interesting. However, medicine today is more evidence-based. So studies are ultimate evidences of new guidelines. Hehehe!

[carpediem]

^ True.

However, I also read that disturbingly, many medical research today are fabricated, and many use faulty statistics to arrive at their conclusions.

[ctan]

yup! kaya we base our guidelines more on those that are of the meta-analysis type. Cochrane has a database on all the metaanalyses done around the world. and, medical societies also have their databanks. so dun kami nagbebase. tsaka, every study done is being appraised na, as per EBM (evidence based med) guidelines.

[carpediem]

(to Doc ctan and also to Kilo)

1. What are your thoughts on people/groups/organizations withholding their findings from the public due to their self-interests?

2. What are your thoughts on people/groups/organizations trying to censure the findings of someone's research? For example, big pharmaceutical companies are trying to suppress some groundbreaking research on life-saving drugs.

3. Stem cell research.

4. "Open-sourcing" of all medical studies and data.

[ctan]

(to Doc ctan and also to Kilo)

1. What are your thoughts on people/groups/organizations withholding their findings from the public due to their self-interests?

2. What are your thoughts on people/groups/organizations trying to censure the findings of someone's research? For example, big pharmaceutical companies are trying to suppress some groundbreaking research on life-saving drugs.

3. Stem cell research.

4. "Open-sourcing" of all medical studies and data.

hehehe. hirap sagutan mga questions on ethics. hahaha! :-)

1. This is unethical.
2. That is one of the reasons why we need to appraise journal entries. Lalo na yung mga company-sponsored studies, the biases are very strong. So most likely, hindi valid yung study so scrapped out sila sa mga meta-analysis from which clinical practice guidelines are based from.
3. Ok lang sa akin.
4. Ok lang naman siguro. I don't know the repercussions. Hehehe. Will look more into that.

[Mr.Yos0]

good morning.