Anong masasabi nyo sa isa pang inutil na batas ng kabobohan ni PNoy? Ang layon nito ay pigilan tayo sa pagpuna sa mga korakot na ginagawa ng mga pulitiko thru blogs at paggamit ng internet. Bawal na punahin ang mga pulitko na gumagamit ng mga taxes na binabayaran natin?
i might be against it.. d ko pa kasi nababasa yung paper eh
Sorry for the words na magagamit ko pero this law is very fucked up! I mean this law is very stupid. The government that we, people implemented is treating us like puppets and robots. Diba, dapat they will lead us? asan leadership don? GOVERNMENT NOW IS VERY HYPOCRITE, NAIVE, CORRUPT, AND VERY VERY STUPID!
^easy.. have you read the entirety of the law?
^klutz, share your thoughts naman..
ipaglaban natin ang ating freedom of expression!
v mag-sign in dito.
http://www.change.org/petitions/junk-the-cybercrime-prevention-law#share
Quote from: Klutz on October 02, 2012, 12:53:38 PM
^easy.. have you read the entirety of the law?
Yes I have. Bago kasi ako mag support or mag againts sa isang order, law or bill. Binabasa ko muna and pinag aaralan ko.
Si tito sotto daw yung nagpalagay ng libel na part para maprotektahan daw ang mga pulitiko este ang mga taong bayan daw. chaaaar!
Quote from: marvinofthefaintsmile on October 03, 2012, 11:07:39 AM
Si tito sotto daw yung nagpalagay ng libel na part para maprotektahan daw ang mga pulitiko este ang mga taong bayan daw. chaaaar!
Noong January pa issue tong Law na to. Before bill pa lang siya. Sinasabi na proprotektahan daw ang people form libel. LIBEL is too vague to be defined. And wala sa bill of rights natin ang pagbabawal sa pagpapahayag ng ating damdamin, may it be tru speech or writing. So WALANG KASONG LIBEL!
Ang I cannot believe na issue ang LIBEL sa philippines eh kung sila ngang mga politiko nag sisiraan eh. DIMANDA KAYA NILA isa't isa. MGA TANGA!
I think that most of our government officials are better off doing movies & commercials, boxing, flirting, showing at Eat Bulaga, being businessmen rather than making SHITTY LAWS!
dapat ang inaatupag nila eh ang hustisya ng mga ampatuan. can't u belive it? itong batas na to eh nagpondo pa sila ng 50Miliion pesos imbes na gamitin pampatayo ng mga schools at hospitals?
IKR! Tanga lang eh. Pero I've seen this coming. Simula palang eh. sa mga campaigns ni noynoy. One good thing na nangyari sa reign niya is yung K12 and di pa sa kanya nag start yun. super tagal ng process bago mapatupad pero ito in a matter of months meron na? how preposterous?
EDUCATION AND ENVIRONMENT first! Then implement ng laws para sa trabaho for our economy's sake. wag yung mga walang kuwentang laws gaya nito.
Ito yung mga nag-agree sa batas na ito.
(http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQLsRe3ra_0-0c1sNItVBWGDBwIrQmI8YdZ1V45huQLQAm7r-ZPmtqtd1VKSQ)
see. look sino sino ba? Mga dating actors at mga nag ka issue na dati. AYAW LANG NILANG MA CRITICIZE sila! HYPOCRITES!
yung isa pa sa kanila eh nangopya pa ng blog entry.
senseless law
HECK YEAH! Kaya nga ang weird. TANGA LANG! Pinatupad kaagad ng di pinopolish? BOBO lang eh. Pnoy's time sucks! BIGTIME!
(http://www.quotednews.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/cyber-crime.jpg)
my 2 cents:
1) sinama ang Libel sa Section 4, pero sa batas ang unang sinabi ang siyang may mabigat na offense (which is illegal access, cybersex, interference) then huli lang yung libel. Bago ka makasuhan ng libelo, kailangan ng (a) publicity [yep, through internet], (b) malice [yep, pag ni-like mo, automatic may willful consent ka], (c) criminal consequence or imputation of natural or juridical person [except na lang kung sobrang balat-sibuyas nung makabasa]:
Liability:
QuoteArt. 355. Libel means by writings or similar means. — A libel committed by means of writing, x x x shall be punished by prision correccional in its minimum and medium periods or a fine ranging from 200 to 6,000 pesos, or both, in addition to the civil action which may be brought by the offended party.
"take note, 1951 pa itong batas na ito hahaha"
2) Magkakaroon ka lang ng liability pag in-encourage mo ang pag-commit ng cybercrime. (Sec. 5, RA 10175). Hindi komo ni-like mo ang isang libelous act, liable ka na. Pwede kung shinare mo; or ni-repost. Pero of all grave offenses, since huling sinabi yung libel: pinaka-minor offense siya. (Interpretation of law)
3) Constitution pa rin ang mananaig. (Art. III, Sec. 4; Bill of Rights). Since hawak ni Noynoy ang Supreme Court {another topic, maraming balita regarding Sereno}, maaaring i-declare nila yung batas na constitutional (kahit na halatang-halatang unconstitutional).
4) Sa huli, halatang-halatang hindi nagbabasa si Noynoy ng pipirmahan niya! HAHAHA :D
P.S. na-enlighten lang ako nung ni-discuss sa akin nung kaklase kong UP Prof. Hope this helps
Dura lex, sed lex.
It's open to a lot of [mis]interpretations, which is not good.
Anyway, knowing the trigger-happy nature of people today, I do not believe liking or resharing automatically constitute malice.
An interpretation i heard was it is if we relate this to the libel articl.e
Quote from: Lanchie on October 06, 2012, 12:01:59 AM
Dura lex, sed lex.
That may be the case but they created that law for their own selfish motives....
Quote from: geo on October 07, 2012, 12:01:34 PM
Quote from: Lanchie on October 06, 2012, 12:01:59 AM
Dura lex, sed lex.
That may be the case but they created that law for their own selfish motives....
I agree. Sino ba ang madalas i-bash ng online community? mosty celebs and politicians. These "famous" people are of course somewhat obliged to keep a "public image" so hindi sila magiging "libelous" .At yang mga yan, may pambayad yan ng kung anong gusto nila na pwedeng i download ng masa sa internet.
Edit: kung gusto nila lagyan ng rules ang paggamit ko sa internet. bayaran nila ang internet ko!
how ironic... galit na galit itong mga public figures na to kapag napupuna sila.....wala na raw sila privacy.... WTF!... that is the price to pay for being a public figure....gusto nyo ng katanyagan at limelight diba? Pay the price for being a public figure (claudine-tulfo incident)..... I have to agree that some people are getting way overboard and I condemn them for doing those things.....Sa simula pa lang, alam na nila na mawawalan sila ng privacy kapag naging artista or tumakbo sila sa posisyion sa gobyerno...Kaya be man enough sotto...
im jon_the_wicked
a cyber criminal...
sabi nila.. dapat jejemon daw ang paglalagay ng status sa fb or gay lingo para di mahuli.
^sakit sa mata at utak noon. Well, for those who aren't jeje and do not know swardspeak.
http://www.interaksyon.com/article/45096/supreme-court-issues-tro-on-anti-cybercrime-act
Quote from: marvinofthefaintsmile on October 03, 2012, 05:16:55 PM
Ito yung mga nag-agree sa batas na ito.
(http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQLsRe3ra_0-0c1sNItVBWGDBwIrQmI8YdZ1V45huQLQAm7r-ZPmtqtd1VKSQ)
eh mga TANG INA PLA NYAN MGA YAN BULLSHIT MGA FUCK YOU MGA POTANG INA NILA SABHIN NILA KAYA NILA PINATUPAD ANG CYBER CRIME LAW DAHIL AYAW NILANG NABABATIKOS SILA VIA INTERNET DAHIL ANG GUSTO LANG NILANG IPOST NATIN SA INTERNET AY PURO MABUBUTI AT NAGPAPATUNAY NA TALGANG ITS MORE FUN IN THE PHILIPPINES INANG NYAN CYBER CRIME LAW PA SILANG NALALAMN MGA !@#$%^&*()_
^at gumastos pa sila ng milyung-milyong piso para lang gawin ang batas na to.. Nasayang lang.. Kung pinagpatayo lang ito ng skwelahan at hospital eh me napala pa tayo.. "Ang tuwid na daan" ni Pnoy nga naman.. oh. o..
Priorities. Priorites.
im a cyber criminal.
so if meron talagang law for this, matagal na akong may kaso. :'(
(https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTF36C2GuJcjeVLFBygkBwKj1Zrr5tRgJZmsdsIFLyFysYbwWwe9Q)