News:

Welcome to PGG Forums:
Ask for tips and advice ranging from men's fashion, grooming, hairstyles and dating women.

Main Menu

Anti Cyber Crime Law

Started by marvinofthefaintsmile, October 02, 2012, 10:28:02 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

superosmdummi

HECK YEAH! Kaya nga ang weird. TANGA LANG! Pinatupad kaagad ng di pinopolish? BOBO lang eh. Pnoy's time sucks! BIGTIME!

marvinofthefaintsmile


pong

my 2 cents:

1) sinama ang Libel sa Section 4, pero sa batas ang unang sinabi ang siyang may mabigat na offense (which is illegal access, cybersex, interference) then huli lang yung libel. Bago ka makasuhan ng libelo, kailangan ng (a) publicity [yep, through internet], (b) malice [yep, pag ni-like mo, automatic may willful consent ka], (c) criminal consequence or imputation of natural or juridical person [except na lang kung sobrang balat-sibuyas nung makabasa]:

Liability:
QuoteArt. 355. Libel means by writings or similar means. — A libel committed by means of writing, x x x shall be punished by prision correccional in its minimum and medium periods or a fine ranging from 200 to 6,000 pesos, or both, in addition to the civil action which may be brought by the offended party.
"take note, 1951 pa itong batas na ito hahaha"

2) Magkakaroon ka lang ng liability pag in-encourage mo ang pag-commit ng cybercrime. (Sec. 5, RA 10175). Hindi komo ni-like mo ang isang libelous act, liable ka na. Pwede kung shinare mo; or ni-repost. Pero of all grave offenses, since huling sinabi yung libel: pinaka-minor offense siya. (Interpretation of law)

3) Constitution pa rin ang mananaig. (Art. III, Sec. 4; Bill of Rights). Since hawak ni Noynoy ang Supreme Court {another topic, maraming balita regarding Sereno}, maaaring i-declare nila yung batas na constitutional (kahit na halatang-halatang unconstitutional).

4) Sa huli, halatang-halatang hindi nagbabasa si Noynoy ng pipirmahan niya! HAHAHA :D


P.S. na-enlighten lang ako nung ni-discuss sa akin nung kaklase kong UP Prof. Hope this helps

Lanchie


carpediem

It's open to a lot of [mis]interpretations, which is not good.

Anyway, knowing the trigger-happy nature of people today, I do not believe liking or resharing automatically constitute malice.

Lanchie

An interpretation i heard was it is if we relate this to the libel articl.e

geo

Quote from: Lanchie on October 06, 2012, 12:01:59 AM
Dura lex, sed lex.

That may be the case but they created that law for their own selfish motives....

bukojob

#22
Quote from: geo on October 07, 2012, 12:01:34 PM
Quote from: Lanchie on October 06, 2012, 12:01:59 AM
Dura lex, sed lex.

That may be the case but they created that law for their own selfish motives....

I agree. Sino ba ang madalas i-bash ng online community? mosty celebs and politicians. These "famous" people are of course somewhat obliged to keep a "public image" so hindi sila magiging "libelous" .At yang mga yan, may pambayad yan ng kung anong gusto nila na pwedeng i download ng masa sa internet.

Edit: kung gusto nila lagyan ng rules ang paggamit ko sa internet. bayaran nila ang internet ko!

geo

#23
how ironic... galit na galit itong mga public figures na to kapag napupuna sila.....wala na raw sila privacy.... WTF!... that is the price to pay for being a public figure....gusto nyo ng katanyagan at limelight diba? Pay the price for being a public figure (claudine-tulfo incident)..... I have to agree that some people are getting way overboard and I condemn them for doing those things.....Sa simula pa lang, alam na nila na mawawalan sila ng privacy kapag naging artista or tumakbo sila sa posisyion sa gobyerno...Kaya be man enough sotto...

Jon

im jon_the_wicked

a cyber criminal...

marvinofthefaintsmile

sabi nila.. dapat jejemon daw ang paglalagay ng status sa fb or gay lingo para di mahuli.

superosmdummi

^sakit sa mata at utak noon. Well, for those who aren't jeje and do not know swardspeak.


Isamu

Quote from: marvinofthefaintsmile on October 03, 2012, 05:16:55 PM
Ito yung mga nag-agree sa batas na ito.




eh mga TANG INA PLA NYAN MGA YAN BULLSHIT MGA FUCK YOU MGA POTANG INA NILA SABHIN NILA KAYA NILA PINATUPAD ANG CYBER CRIME LAW DAHIL AYAW NILANG NABABATIKOS SILA VIA INTERNET DAHIL ANG GUSTO LANG NILANG IPOST NATIN SA INTERNET AY PURO MABUBUTI AT NAGPAPATUNAY NA TALGANG ITS MORE FUN IN THE PHILIPPINES INANG NYAN CYBER CRIME LAW PA SILANG NALALAMN MGA !@#$%^&*()_

marvinofthefaintsmile

^at gumastos pa sila ng milyung-milyong piso para lang gawin ang batas na to.. Nasayang lang.. Kung pinagpatayo lang ito ng skwelahan at hospital eh me napala pa tayo.. "Ang tuwid na daan" ni Pnoy nga naman.. oh. o..